 |
| Home | Topics | Index | Newest | Bookstore | Reprints | Privacy | About |
|
| Home | Topics | Index | Newest | Bookstore | Reprints | Privacy | About |
Two dog owners in Sauk Rapids, Minnesota, have been granted a summary judgment against the city for two dog limit laws the judge called “an invalid exercise of police power violating the plaintiffs' Constitutional right to due process.”
“The court finds that ownership of dogs and other pets is a property right which is protected by the Constitution,” said District Court Judge Thomas P. Knapp when he granted the judgment on June 5.
One of the laws limited owners to two dogs, with an exemption for puppies under six months of age. The second law allowed owners to keep up to four dogs if they obtained a permit and to keep more than four dogs if they got permission from their neighbors. There was no grandfather clause; if owners could not get approval from all neighbors within 100 feet of their property line, additional dogs would have to be placed elsewhere or surrendered to authorities. Penalty for failure to get neighbors' permission was 90 days in jail and $700 fine.
The request for judgment came from Mary P. Holt, who rescues and fosters Newfoundlands, and Cynthia Eveslage, a dog trainer and breeder. Holt has 12 dogs and no permit; Eveslage has three adult dogs and a permit to keep up to four dogs. Neither woman contacted neighbors to get permission to keep more than four dogs.
The women challenged the ordinance on these grounds:
Holt and Eveslage compiled reports of complaints involving dogs in the city and demonstrated that the complaints were not related to numbers. They also offered depositions of six officials who testified that there was no evidence that supported the limits before they were passed.
The judge found for the plaintiffs on the Constitutional grounds that the city had abused its power to create laws that promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the citizens and violated the guarantee of due process before property is taken. He said that the city failed to provide relevant evidence that the laws were needed.
The judge then denied the city's request for summary judgment against the women. The plaintiffs are not required to comply with unconstitutional laws and thus were not obliged to obtain the unanimous approval of neighbors before keeping their dogs. Furthermore, the judge found that the Constitution does protect pet ownership. He declared the laws unconstitutional and enjoined the city from enforcement. However, he did not award damages or attorneys fees.
This is the second court decision striking down pet limit laws. The first took place in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and removed an ordinance that limited residents to five pets. In resolving that case, the judge quoted from Kadash vs City of Williamsport, 1975: “What is not an infringement upon public safety and is not a nuisance cannot be made one by legislative fiat and then prohibited. Even legitimate legislative goals cannot be pursued by means which stifle fundamental personal liberty when the goals can otherwise be more reasonably achieved.”
The Sauk Rapids case was supported by the Minnesota Coalition of Dog Clubs; Tanick is national attorney for the American Dog Owners' Association.
[More on limit laws, breed bans and other dog laws][Dog Owner's Guide: Dog limit called unconstitutional in Minnesota (www.canismajor.com/dog/minnlaw1.html)] is a part of the Dog Owner's Guide internet website and is copyright 2008 by Canis Major Publications. You may print or download this material for non-commercial personal or school educational use. All other rights reserved. If you, your organization or business would like to reprint our articles in a newsletter or distribute them free of charge as an educational handout please see our reprint policy.
| Home | Topics | Index | Newest | Bookstore | Reprints | Privacy | About |
| Related articles | Related books |
 Have
you seen the rest of the Dog Owner's Guide articles on Canine issues?
Don't miss the rest of our articles.
Training, health, nutrition and more. . . . |
 Looking
for more information about Dog limit called unconstitutional in Minnesota, Canine issues?
See our list below, visit amazon.com
or Dogwise,
All Things Dog for those hard-to-find dog books! |
| Dog Owner's Guide Related Articles |
This is article 27 of 28 in the Canine issues topic.
Next Article: Animal charities solicit dollars from pet lovers: Help with making informed choices
Previous Article: Cincinnati, Ohio, dog law activity: Southwestern Ohio anti-dog laws gather steam
Related articles:
Table of contents for "Canine issues" only: This topic's table of contents
Site Topic and article lists:
Site topic list: Quick list of topics
Site table of contents: All Dog Owner's Guide articles, listed by topic
| Books of Interest |
|
|
Wondering what dog books are selling at Amazon? |
Dog Owner's Guide, in association with AMAZON.COM, recommends these books for more information on . . .
Although we don't have any books specifically about this article perhaps the following books will be of interest.
